Trump on pausing some tariffs: "They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid" #shorts

Insider trading. Th rich are getting richer.

Call him Yippy Donny

🤪

Democrats already won big in Supreme court 😂 Blue waves coming…

I think he’s a little “yippee”… who says that

FT!

You think wrong! You're fired! You're a joke!

😂😂😂😂yippy give me a break

Why are you guys dishing out lies. This was not a pause on anything it was just a bait and switch for the NYSE. He's slapping the American people with 10% increase on all of our consumption. Stop the lies CBS

Thanks for the update,
I understand the mess that you have been left.

Add to his crimes and extortionist

Boatoxs doesn’t do anything on you anymore ?

"Yippee-Ki-Yay" 😅

Trump is never specific or gives details when he speaks.

1. 10% Permanent Tariff as the Anchor Policy:
The baseline 10% tariff wasn’t just economic policy—it was ideological. It signaled a systemic shift away from globalism toward economic nationalism. Inspired by thinkers like Oren Cass, the goal was to create a predictable, durable trade environment that would protect American industry, restore supply chain resilience, and reduce dependency on geopolitical rivals. By anchoring this policy in a “permanent” framework, Trump positioned it not as a temporary pressure point but as a new normal for global trade with the U.S.

2. Secondary Tariffs as a Tactical Smokescreen:
The much steeper tariffs—some as high as 125% on Chinese imports—served as the loud, headline-grabbing shock. But they weren’t meant to last. These were high-visibility moves designed to serve several strategic functions:
• Negotiation pressure: They created urgent incentives for countries to engage with the U.S. on bilateral deals.
• Domestic distraction: They masked the deeper, longer-term impact of the 10% baseline tariff by pulling focus onto the more extreme measures.
• Room to retreat: By building in the possibility of reduction, the administration allowed itself to appear flexible and pragmatic later—without ever walking back the core 10%.

3. Pre-baked Adjustment Mechanism:
The 90-day tariff suspension for most countries wasn’t a reversal—it was the next planned phase. It allowed Trump to appear responsive to market concerns, easing investor panic while maintaining leverage. Publicly, it was a de-escalation; strategically, it was part of a staged rollout that gave the illusion of compromise without compromising the core objective. This helped blunt criticisms about triggering a global trade war or recession.

4. Interest Rates, Bonds, and Market Dynamics:
Trump’s team was also playing on the psychology of the markets. By sparking initial uncertainty, they triggered a flight to safety—pushing investors into long-term U.S. government bonds. That demand helped cap yields, indirectly putting downward pressure on interest rates. It’s possible this was a designed side effect: using policy shockwaves to subtly influence macroeconomic levers without leaning on the Fed.

5. China’s 125% Tariff – the Real Target:
Unlike the other countries, China wasn’t offered a de-escalation path. The 125% tariff was punitive, intended to isolate Beijing, break dependency chains, and signal a total decoupling trajectory. In that sense, China wasn’t just a trading partner being negotiated with—it was the centerpiece of a broader realignment. The sharp difference in treatment (tariff relief for most nations, escalation for China) wasn’t accidental—it was central to the strategy.

6. Corporate Commitments and National Reinvestment:
This tariff regime wasn’t just about imports—it was about triggering domestic reinvestment. Behind the scenes, the administration reportedly secured verbal commitments from major corporations to expand manufacturing, reshore production, and rebuild U.S.-based supply chains. Tariffs made this more than patriotism—it made it economically rational. With ongoing price unpredictability from overseas, domestic production suddenly looked more stable and competitive.

In totality, Trump’s strategy wasn’t erratic—it was sequenced.
It used shock-and-awe tactics to draw headlines and create urgency, then pivoted to a more stable posture once the groundwork was laid. The higher, “secondary” tariffs were always intended to be temporary—leveraged as negotiation bluffs and optical decoys—while the permanent 10% tariff quietly took root beneath the noise.

This layered strategy operated across trade, monetary policy, public perception, and diplomatic channels—more of a coordinated economic campaign than a one-off policy move. Whether one agrees with the goals or not, the structure suggests a level of strategic planning not often acknowledged in the media narrative.

Snowstorm In the comment section. Don't get yippy snowflakes

Flip floppy president

Let’s hope he makes a comeback. People want him to fail but that’d just be hurting us in the end. He’s our president people. We can’t do nothing about it.

Trump u were getting Yipee. .😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅😅

The Traitor in chief is seriously pathetic and weak.